• Welcome to PlumbersForums.net - The international free plumbing advice forum. Professional plumbers sharing advice with fellow plumbers and DIY alike. Register for free today! - Checkout the Plumbing Advice forum and then our Plumbing Videos area which still needs populating.

From the United States of America? - Checkout our specific plumbing forum for you:USA Plumbing Forum

Discuss Mixing Pressure Problems in the Central Heating Forum area at PlumbersForums.net

Messages
1,630
Thanks but can't read the attachments.

What do you mean by
" waited until primary was sending warm back to the boiler "

Is/was the CH or/and the HW on while taking these tests?

Can you see what that item is in the picture showing the cylinder, above. (post 21)

I honestly cannot see that system working as is with the NRV installed where it is and without the CH or HW on as well, at best then IMO, the injector pump will take some of the cooled water returning from the rads/cylinder coil and inject it into the manifold but that temperature is completely dependent on that return temperature which may be even lower than the required UFH temperature, also the "bypass" is stationed far too close to the injector pump to give any real temperature or contra flows separation.
Can you have a quick read through those pages and see what commissioning problems they had and a explanation of how the system is supposed to work.

Taking the injected water supply from between the NRV and the boiler would definitely make some bit of sense as it is then hot injected water at a set (boiler) temperature.
 
Last edited:
Messages
30
I've tried to annotate the picture to label each item.

Hope this makes a bit of sense.

Water.jpg
[automerge]1606770384[/automerge]
Thanks but can't read the attachments.

What do you mean by
" waited until primary was sending warm back to the boiler "

I just meant that I restricted water flow through bypass so that the return to the boiler heated up.

Is/was the CH or/and the HW on while taking these tests?

I hadn't switched anything off

Can you see what that item is in the picture showing the cylinder, above. (post 21)

Wasn't sure what you meant so I annotated the original photo

I honestly cannot see that system working as is with the NRV installed where it is and without the CH or HW on as well, at best then IMO, the injector pump will take some of the cooled water returning from the rads/cylinder coil

No rads and cylinder coil has its own NRV as shown

and inject it into the manifold but that temperature is completely dependent on that return temperature which may be even lower than the required UFH temperature, also the "bypass" is stationed far too close to the injector pump to give any real temperature or contra flows separation.

The contra flow separation proximity is what I thought the problem was.

Can you have a quick read through those pages and see what commissioning problems they had and a explanation of how the system is supposed to work.

Taking the injected water supply from between the NRV and the boiler would definitely make some bit of sense as it is then hot injected water at a set (boiler) temperature.
[automerge]1606770875[/automerge]
Here's the scanned pages.
 

Attachments

  • TapScanner 11-30-2020-21.08.pdf
    757.8 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Messages
1,630
Can you take a snapshot on the left around where I have continued the red line showing the pipework layout, in particular any NRV (the ones you showed are motorized zoning valves)

Read the Tap scanned pages, the most important item now is to see where (if) this NRV is.


UFH Pump Injected System near Cylinder rev1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Messages
1,630
I think that's about as clear as you can get it, there isn't a NRV between the T off for the HW cylinder coil and the motorised UFH zoning valve so that means that the hot water is supplied to the UFH once its opened despite the original drawing showing one, I wonder why?.
So, as you said the proximity of the injection pump and by pass vale is the main problem although I find it inexplicable that a system would be designed this way... it may work if mods made as in attachment, I don't see any reason to have the hot & cold looped as this only creates a full fledged by pass once the UFH zone valve is opened, also the original injection pump was a standard pump which can be speed controlled.UFH Baxi rev1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Messages
30
Thanks again John,

I've restricted the flow on the bypass valve and turned the Alpha down to constant setting (II). I'll see if that's enough flow to get at least a little bit of heat into the system. I was also wondering if an auto bypass valve might help.

As you know a bit about pumps do you think this one would be suitable as the documentation says that the original was a grundfos 15-50.


I just can't find out if it's controllable.

I'll speak to my heating engineer and see if he can make the relevant changes (although he's the one who put the alpha on!).

Thanks once again for your help with this enigma! One day I will get it to function correctly
 
Messages
1,630
No, I don't think that pump is compatible with the controller, I wouldn't be too worried about the actual speed control just now, if you and your engineer thinks the mods may work then just do them first. It may be beneficial to install a ABV in the system.
When did he fit this Alpha??,
 
Messages
30
I moved in to this house about 7 years ago. The UFH has never really worked since we moved in.

I think that as it wasn't working he swapped the injection pump about 5 years ago when he changed the boiler.

The system had a dutch boiler and Danish manifolds. Essentially each year we just swap the pieces bit by bit for things that are actually recognised in the UK.

To be fair to our hearing engineer, everything was pretty much non standard and so trying to pin down the problem was a nightmare.

My initial thoughts were that he had over pressurised the UFH when he replaced my downstairs manifold so a week ago I started doing my research. Then I thought it was the bypass valve, but I didn't know enough to be sure. I think my wife thinks I'm having an affair with the boiler as I've spent so much time in that room "fiddeling". Turns out I actually might have been right lol. Thanks once again.
 
Messages
1,630
Just re thinking suggested mods, suggest just relocating by pass and isol valve but do not remove the return loop to the boiler as high risk of too low circulation flow through the boiler if UFH only on.
[automerge]1606859215[/automerge]
Back for more punishment, I think that rather than a PRV in the by pass that a two port Tapstat might give far better control, you can attach the sensor to the return (or the mixed flow pipe as desired) and it will/should then control to the requiredtemperature. If you install another isol valve in the by pass you can then isolate it and install/change to which ever device gives the best results.
 
Last edited:
Messages
30
Evening John, It's the enigma that's more puzzling than a Rubik's cube.

I think that whatever you put in there, it's always going to be too close to the injection feed. I've been playing around with it today again and as long as I keep the Grundfos Alpha on it's lowest setting I do get hot water to flow just not enough. Problem is that I'll never get enough if I'm that close to the injector because more water will always equal more pressure which will inevitably mean feeding back into the injector loop. (Managed to get the mix feed up to 31 degrees today a new record, although it only stayed at that for half an hour).

Next enigma is trying to get a heating engineer to come and sort it out before the snow hits, and it's a bit of a trek from the south of Ireland to the North of England...

I'll keep you in the loop (Oh the puns!)
 
Messages
1,630
Any of the drawings refer to the bypass as just that.***. a bypass and it would appear to be just that, ie, a bypass for the injector pump. If there were no injector pump fitted then now that we know there is no NRV fitted, that bypass IMO would supply almost ample flow from the boiler circ pump bearing in mind that it only has to supply only ~ 25/35% of the mixed flow. NO where is there any mention of cold water return to the boiler which is just as important as any injector pump or whatever so was something forgotten in the whole design.
Maybe at the end of the day thermostatic mixing is the real answer?. So, yes, heating engineer or magician needed.
 
Messages
306
I've watched this thread with interest im still sure only real cure is in essence to convert manifolds to standard pump/blender layout its done that way because it works!.
If its what you want flow temperatures double what our achieving would be possible
 

Reply to Mixing Pressure Problems in the Central Heating Forum area at PlumbersForums.net

New Posts Threads Members

Top