Search the forum,

Discuss Is 18mm plywood enough for loft tank support base, & what type of ply? in the USA area at PlumbersForums.net

Messages
90
Hi

I've got some upcoming plumbing work and everything is being drained down for it, so I'm taking the opportunity to replace the boards under the tank in the loft because they have signs of woodworm... I'm hoping to use 18mm ply because it is available at B&Q where they will cut it to size for free, which will save time, hassle, and will mean I can fit it in the car! But is 18mm thick enough?

Here's some relevant info:

  • The existing base is T&G floorboards and they're 20mm
  • The tank spans three joists
  • The joists are 150mm x 37mm. Joist centres are average 400mm apart.
  • There are no walls beneath the tank. The nearest wall is a solid internal wall, which is 500mm away from the tank, to the side.
  • The tank is 40 gallon / 182L actual (60 / 273 nominal)

If 18mm will be enough, it seems B&Q offer two types of ply and I wondered which is best please?



Many thanks for sticking with me through this bathroom refit and all it involves!!!

PS - if this is more suited to a different sub forum please move it to where ever is best. Cheers.
 
Make sure whatever you use its waterproof.

What timbers do you have at right angles to the joists?

It's really a skilled job to spread the load over several joists. Four joists would be a better number. A really good job would end up with a nice even load on each of the four.

Silly question: is there lots of other stuff up there?

Cheers,

Roy (amateur with no relevant qualifications)
 
Ideally marine ply. Weight of tank is one thing but also allow for weight of bod fitting it/changing ballvalve etc on the joists! From the description with the wall 500mm away (what about the other direction?) you'll be okay for support.
 
18mm is fine, seen tanks on all sorts of junk. Marine ply is good if you want belt an braces. Why not pick up some more boards while you are there, for you and future engineers to stand on while working on the tank?
 
Hi

I've got some upcoming plumbing work and everything is being drained down for it, so I'm taking the opportunity to replace the boards under the tank in the loft because they have signs of woodworm... I'm hoping to use 18mm ply because it is available at B&Q where they will cut it to size for free, which will save time, hassle, and will mean I can fit it in the car! But is 18mm thick enough?

Here's some relevant info:

  • The existing base is T&G floorboards and they're 20mm
  • The tank spans three joists
  • The joists are 150mm x 37mm. Joist centres are average 400mm apart.
  • There are no walls beneath the tank. The nearest wall is a solid internal wall, which is 500mm away from the tank, to the side.
  • The tank is 40 gallon / 182L actual (60 / 273 nominal)

If 18mm will be enough, it seems B&Q offer two types of ply and I wondered which is best please?



Many thanks for sticking with me through this bathroom refit and all it involves!!!

PS - if this is more suited to a different sub forum please move it to where ever is best. Cheers.
The water weighs 182Kg plus the tank and innerds. That's over 28.6 stone. (400.4 lb).

Its a fair weight and needs to be supported correctly. Have you looked at what the joists rest in or on?
Do you think they will take that weight?
Can you not add more support if necessary from something like a Purlin?

Ply is stronger than floor board so I think you're considering the right material for the tank base to sit on.
 
Thank you very much for the replies. I'll try to address each point raised....

Make sure whatever you use its waterproof.
Ideally marine ply.

I'll have another look for marine ply but the difficulty is finding somewhere with a cutting service, or who will deliver without charging £££. If I used the B&Q stuff, could I paint it or use some kind of oil to waterproof it? Or sheet it in a plastic membrane type thing? Mind you, the mice would probably make a meal of that last option...

What timbers do you have at right angles to the joists?

None. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but the boards are and will be directly on the joists. The height is restricted so there's no option to put right angled cross joists beneath.

Four joists would be a better number.

Perhaps I gave the wrong info? I'm not sure... But what I meant is that the tank itself JUST spans three joists. The board will span 4 joists at least, possibly 5 (depending on what length I can get up there through the hatch). So does that make things better?

Silly question: is there lots of other stuff up there?

I think my questions are sillier ;) No, nothing else up there aside from the F&E tank which is a little further along on the same platform (but a few joists away).

with the wall 500mm away (what about the other direction?)
Have you looked at what the joists rest in or on?

The wall that's 500mm away is an internal solid wall. Seems the joists rest directly on that. But then resting on the joists is a large purlin which is supporting the roof. It's the same on the other side, and I'll add a photo of that. The purlin on the other side is 1000mm away. However, the wall (external) on that side is lower, as the ceiling slopes down to it. So the joists don't sit on the wall on that side, but join the rafters on the far side of the chunky purlin. I think I've got my terms right! But let me know if none of that makes sense!

Here's those photos:

IMG_20211118_104034382.jpg

IMG_20211118_104351948.jpg


Why not pick up some more boards while you are there, for you and future engineers to stand on while working on the tank?

Good thinking. I have got loft boarding on my radar. There are some boards up there already which are enough for when working on the tank. It's a long loft though and I intend to put a "walk [crawl] way" from one end to the other. Perhaps I'll cover that in insulation, but in such a way that the insulation can be moved aside to uncover the boards when access is needed.


Cheers everyone :)
 
Assuming the hardwood version is Weather and Boil Proof (often marked WBP), then it should be fine. Someone did once show me a document that showed that by law you should be using marine grade, but I have yet to see an installation of a cistern on anything better than hardwood WBP. And you see a lot on chipboard! Ideally get the ply cut so it is at least 200mm wider and longer than the cistern, though bear in mind you need to get it into the loft. 18mm should be fine.

As far as your joists are concerned, I'd argue that what worked before will work again. 150mmx37mm joists are what I have in my first floor and they span 10'. If two heavy people walk around, there's your 30st. And that's a moving load, not a static one. The concern with joists tends being overloaded tends to be that they will bend a very long time before they break (George Orwell commented that the Wigan miners preferred wooden pit props to steel ones for this very reason), so sudden failure is very unlikely.

You do need to try to get a foot clearance above the access ports or lid of your new cistern if you want to be able to clean it (and to comply with the water regulations).
 
I can't see everything but is it not better to span the purlins with timbers (if they are only 3' apart) and drop legs onto more timbers spanning the joist for a little added strength in the centre?

Like I say, I can't see it and don't know the height you have above the tank.

The purlins are normally set into the gables and will take more weight than ceiling joists.
 
I can't see everything but is it not better to span the purlins with timbers (if they are only 3' apart) and drop legs onto more timbers spanning the joist for a little added strength in the centre?

Like I say, I can't see it and don't know the height you have above the tank.

The purlins are normally set into the gables and will take more weight than ceiling joists.
Excellent idea, but the OP claims the height is a restriction.
None. Sorry if I wasn't clear, but the boards are and will be directly on the joists. The height is restricted so there's no option to put right angled cross joists beneath.
 
Assuming the hardwood version is Weather and Boil Proof (often marked WBP), then it should be fine.

I don't think it is, but I'll give the branch a call and check for sure. I'll report back. If it isn't, could I still use it if I treat it with something, and any recommendations on what to use if so?

From the above, I presume the hardwood is better than the softwood version?


Ideally get the ply cut so it is at least 200mm wider and longer than the cistern

Longer should be fine. In fact, I'm going to try to get a piece that is long enough to allow for 400mm beyond the tank on each side, which will take it to the next joist on both sides (giving a 5 joist span in total).

Wider... In my current plan the board would only be 650mm wide. The base of the tank is 500mm, so only 75mm each side. The loft hatch is indeed what's determining that width. If I go ahead with the 5 joist span length and the 650mm width, that can all be one single piece of board. Option B would be to go wider and use two separate pieces, with the join beneath the tank. Not sure if that then reduces the strength compared to a single piece though?


Thanks for all this great help

EDIT - crossed posts. Yes, there's restricted height so the tank can't go any higher I'm afraid.
 
I haven't read or absorbed all the recommendations but you really don't need marine grade or waterproof/resistant materials.

If you can't increase the height of the floor you could reinforce the joists by doubling up from one supporting wall (or as close as) to another.
 
As gmartine says, really. You'd get away with chipboard or OSB. But please don't. Realistically, tongue and grooved boards are fine, and any plywood should be fine. The point of WBP is it will stand repeated condensation and drying cycles without the glue that holds it all together failing. I suppose if people really used their brains, the cheapest chipboard, thorougly coated with bitumen and then covered by a 10mm sheet of Kingspan would be seen as acceptable, but we write laws to cover situations where people don't comply with the law in other areas, so it all gets a bit silly.

For instance, what most of the press did not bother to tell us is that the baby, BBC NEWS | UK | England | Somerset | Focus on baby death safety checks - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/somerset/7179092.stm that was drowned/scalded to death follwing a faulty immersion heater thermostat overheating a cistern, might have escaped death if the property had had a properly installed loft cistern in the first place. According to the BBC, 'the inquest was told the tank at the Hardies' home had been mounted on an old door during modernisation work in 1973 and part of the tank was overhanging.' So what do we do as a nation? Send inspectors to check the Rubbish that has gone on in council housing and the private sector and ensure that landlords fulfill a duty of care in this and in other matters (which would also have prevented Grenfell happening)? No, instead we insist that all new thermostats be fitted with a safety cutout and we change thermostats in council housing. Which saves a death every decade or so.

I'm convinced 100mm is a law and that so is marine ply, but even I struggle to see under what conditions a 75mm underlap wouldn't be enough, and it seems sensible to think that a single piece spanning all joists is better than 100mm underlap and have to cut it in half, thus spreading the weight less effectively. Am I to believe that a metal or asbestos-cement tank needs a 100mm underlap to be safe? What if it is literally only ever used for cold water and not connected to a cylinder at all? Yet I don't think the law specifies the cistern material or temperature application. So, I'd also suggest a circular and high cistern needs more of a support than a long and low cistern, and I'd particularly doubt a coffin-type that has only two small access holes in the solid lid would be likely to split whether it has a 100mm underlap or a 10mm one. Probably the 100mm rule is there because if the cistern gets shifted, if has to move 100mm before it starts to fall off the edge. Use your common sense - the fact that you are bothering to ask this sort of question rather than go ahead and say 'Stop bothering me! - I know what I'm doing... Leave me alone! - I've never done this before' suggests you are unlikely to get it far wrong.

If I were in your situation, I'd consider 75mm will be fine, particularly if I had overheat devices built into my boiler and, a cut-out on the immersion heater thermostat, and made sure the cistern is dead central and stays dead central. Then you'll die when a volcano erupts directly below your house - hadn't thought of that, had you?
 
But seriously, I'm thinking 18mm with the suggested overlaps will indeed be fine, and that in all honesty there probably isn't much need to treat the wood with anything either...

I made the thread wondering if all the answers would be a definite "NO!". So I'm feeling sufficiently re-assured now.

Cheers for all the help.
 

Reply to Is 18mm plywood enough for loft tank support base, & what type of ply? in the USA area at PlumbersForums.net

Similar plumbing topics

I was stupid enough not to check the position of the pipes under the tiles when installing a toilet and drilled right through the center of a 16 mm copper water pipe. I exposed the pipe by removing a ~30cm section of the plastic sleeve and a ~10 cm section of the pipe around the hole. Several...
Replies
0
Views
186
We run a community village hall and have a large kitchen provided for the use of hirers. This includes a Lincat SLR9 gas cooker which I believe is a 23.8Kw appliance with all six burners and oven on max. This was installed some 10 years ago and has passed all subsequent Gas Safety inspections as...
Replies
5
Views
439
Creating content since 2001. Untold Media.

Newest Plumbing Threads

Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock