J
julesverne
Illuminati possibly ? Not that i believe that crap.
Discuss party political broadcasts in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net
Croppie crawl into your cave with a copy of gardeners world,when you come out it may be the 1960's again and all things are rosy,as for me I am gonna be like 'keanu' in the matrix and score with the hot chicks and runaway from the suited men..
I'm in the inner circle of what you believe to be the NWO Paul
You want to waste your time and energy believing all that faff then all power to you.
It's a waste of time though
Long enough.
Mark, RA, and a few others.....
Mason's you fool.
Not the bleeding mormons!
I'd help your dog bite the mormons!
Also is making a statement that if you are a ukip member then you are racist not the same as somebody saying all muslims are terrorists?
Nobody made that statement as far as I can see, Simon. But there has been a disturbing number of outright racist, homophobic and misogynistic views expressed by UKIP candidates.
Each and every time, Farage has tried to distance himself from the individual, and they have either or been sacked. But this seems no more than a smokescreen - people are not generally able to rise to prominent positions in political parties whilst espousing views opposing those of the party. Is he claiming that ALL of these bigots have been Trojan horses? That he has been surprised by their views which they have managed to conceal thus far? If so, then he is a fool and a very poor judge of character. I personally believe that UKIP is comprised of the more articulate end of the far right.
As for the Muslims and terrorist comparison - again, very valid. But when the 9/11 and London bombings occurred there was a huge, strident expectation that moderate Muslims speak out against the terrorists and distance themselves from those views, and very rightly so. Nobody should support such atrocities. I don't think it is asking too much for those who claim to be liberal to be vocal in their disapproval of UKIP's thug element. I don't see or hear much of that.
UKIP is tapping into an exclusionary island mentality inherent in a large element of UK society. Having colonised and interfered with large areas of the world, having invited people in when cheap labour was required, that element now wants to close the doors and get rid of those it invited in. Ask yourself why ethnic minorities have set up enclaves. There is a whole generation of people who tried very hard to integrate but were rejected, vilified and brutally, violently rebuffed. That generation withdrew into itself and taught the next generation not to even try and be British, as it's futile. The current ghetto situation in so much of the North West is a direct result of racism in the 60s, 70s and 80s. Those disenfranchised people were seduced by the fundamentalists because they felt they did not belong, would never belong, and had nothing to lose. UKIP is furthering that sense of division and alienation.
I'll hazard a guess because no one was buying fish and chips. Would you be asking the same if it was a church of Christian persuasionthat is all well and good Mas,BUTcan you tell me why knocked down a perfectly good chipshop in Sheffield to put a Mosque on it.
The New World Order being whom exactly?
that is all well and good Mas,BUTcan you tell me why knocked down a perfectly good chipshop in Sheffield to put a Mosque on it.
I'll hazard a guess because no one was buying fish and chips. Would you be asking the same if it was a church of Christian persuasion
Well, let me see - without knowing the actual circumstances (as I doubt you do, either), I might guess that the chippie might not have been making money, that the premises were up for sale, and that some people bought the place, got planning permission, and built a mosque.
Or I could speculate that there is some massive jihadist movement to stamp out fish and potato consumption in the UK. Unlikely as Islam does not ban either fish or root vegetables. Maybe the fundamentalists don't like pickled eggs? Who knows? It's all a big mystery. Or not.
I personally believe that UKIP is comprised of the more articulate end of the far right.
I don't think it is asking too much for those who claim to be liberal to be vocal in their disapproval of UKIP's thug element. I don't see or hear much of that.
UKIP is tapping into an exclusionary island mentality inherent in a large element of UK society. Having colonised and interfered with large areas of the world,
having invited people in when cheap labour was required, that element now wants to close the doors and get rid of those it invited in.
Ask yourself why ethnic minorities have set up enclaves. There is a whole generation of people who tried very hard to integrate but were rejected, vilified and brutally, violently rebuffed. That generation withdrew into itself and taught the next generation not to even try and be British, as it's futile. The current ghetto situation in so much of the North West is a direct result of racism in the 60s, 70s and 80s. Those disenfranchised people were seduced by the fundamentalists because they felt they did not belong, would never belong, and had nothing to lose. UKIP is furthering that sense of division and alienation.
Thanks for the "articulate". I'm less sure about the "far right" part.
What thug element Mas? As you say, Farage has sacked or forced to resign some people who shot their mouths off. But thats just talk. I think I am right in saying that UKIP is the only party which bans former BNP members from joining. Show me some thuggery, and I'll be there to voice my disapproval.
Hang on a moment! I haven't colonised anyone, and neither has anyone I know. Name me any major country in the world, and I will find you something in their history to beat the current population with.
Sorry Mas, but you've got it wrong again. I don't want to get rid of anyone, except possibly a few criminals that would have been sent home under existing laws if our government had not lost track of them. I don't even want to close the door - I just want to see control of that door to be a) effective and b) decided by politicians who are democratically accountable to the people of the UK not bureaucrats in Brussels.
Sure, there has been some cr@p behaviour. I cringe to think that I share a species with some people - whether the skinhead thugs of my youth or their sons and grandsons of today. I look back at the casual racism of the 70s and 80s (sorry, don't remember the 60s) with shame and disgust. We don't, incidentally, need skin colour to divide us in order to behave badly - as the history of Northern Ireland demonstrates all to well.
But the solution is not to pretend that there isn't a problem - which was effectively what Labour claimed from 1997 to 2010, with little better being done since. The solution is to accept that there is a problem, and to start a grown up debate about it.
This is not helped if every time someone tries to open the debate, we start finger-pointing and shouting racist. Its the very fact that the three major parties are frightened of addressing the situation that has led us to where we are.
Really, Ray? So Britain's historical role in the world is not relevant? Two wrongs don't make a right so even if you can find something odious in other nations' histories, using that as an excuse to abdicate responsibility for British colonialism is pretty facile.
So you haven't personally colonised any country. Guess what? I haven't personally tried to impose Sharia law on anyone, but as a (albeit very lapsed) Muslim, I am condemned under UKIPs policies and views.
YOU don't want to get rid of anyone, but UKIP do. That is why I am so surprised at you. Whether you personally support that policy is not really relevant as long as you support the organisation that supports it. When you vote UKIP, you cannot state that you only support stronger border controls. You vote for ALL their policies with one single cross on the ballot paper.
You're right, shouting racist to stifle debate is unhelpful, but then so is failing to call a spade a spade.
The UKIP may claim to ban former BNP members form joining. How exactly do they enforce this? It's an very easy claim to make, because they know that there is NO way for anyone to dispute it. The rhetoric and behaviour of certain UKIP members paint a different picture...
Long enough.
Mark, RA, and a few others.....
i got married in a masonic lodge. had a choice of upstairs in a weird room with a chessboard like floor or downstairs. Plumped for downstairs as it looked less hammer horror,esq.
I'll happily debate both the positive and negative impacts of British colonial history with you Mas - but perhaps on another thread. However, wheeling out "colonialism guilt" without an enormous contextual background as part of this debate is roughly as useful as shouting "racist".
Before answering this thread, I thought I had better check my facts. So I re-read the official UKIP policy on their website. I also read their manifestos for both the European and local elections. I can find nothing there that calls for repatriation, expulsion or anything similar. Or, for that matter, anything remotely anti-muslim.
So I can only see three possibilities.
1) I have missed some critical document which lays out such a policy or
2) That there is some hidden policy set of which you are aware, but I am not
3) That you have been made to think that UKIP has policies which in fact they don't have, by parties or individuals in whose interests it is to rubbish UKIP.
I will confess that I found an excess of material relating to immigration, and (to my mind) insufficient on what I consider to be the core issue of leaving the EU. I think that this is both a tactical and strategic mistage, and had I been asked, I would have counselled against it.
An unfortunate choice of metaphor.
It is a trick as old as politics to impute foul hidden motives to ones opponents, and to seek amongst their more extreme supporters those who can be held up as the "true face" of whatever-it-is-you-want-to-rubbish. It behoves all of us to look more carefully at the actual facts and evidence, and not to take positions based on either emotion or on ethnic, political, religious or sectarian loyalties.
I think the party as a whole have no objection to these views, probably support them in private, but in public, profess abhorrence.
I think we are going to have to agree to differ. I get the feeling that we are the two noisy people arguing furiously in the corner of the bar, whilst everyone else in the pub is wishing we would shut the blinking flip up.
I think we are going to have to agree to differ. I get the feeling that we are the two noisy people arguing furiously in the corner of the bar, whilst everyone else in the pub is wishing we would shut the blinking flip up.
Just found an interesting website that weighs up the pro's and cons of voting for UKIP.
Should I vote UKIP?
Just found an interesting website that weighs up the pro's and cons of voting for UKIP.
Should I vote UKIP?
I'm still undecided, we have different parties over here. 3 I would never vote for, 2 others? dunno yet.
But personally I treat politics like religion. Each man, in his heart of hearts, knows what he is. And that makes it a purely personal matter.
bit more hard core I suppose over there with the troubles,i was researching life in Belfast the other day(no work on)its turned into one of the safest citys in the UK now,
Still at high level threats of terrorism though. Every other week there's a new dissident republican group spring up......
must have been strange growing up,thinking I could get kneecapped today or worse,i just had to avoid vennerial disease..
Dunno, never grew up here, I've only been over here 9 years. I'm a Londoner Paul.
I reckon we should ask Dan to re-configure the forum so that this is automatically posted every time the subject turns to religion, politics or Worcester Bosch boilers.
Or better still an animated .gif of Father Jack shouting "That would be an ecumenical matter!"
View attachment 18608
I reckon we should ask Dan to re-configure the forum so that this is automatically posted every time the subject turns to religion, politics or Worcester Bosch boilers.
Reply to party political broadcasts in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.