W
webby252
First of all apologies if this doesn't make complete sense as I know next to nothing about plumbing.
I am having a house built and the plumber has installed all of his pipes prior to the screed being laid on the ground floor. The screed will completely cover a number of pipes.
When the company arrived to fit the underfloor heating loops (prior to the screed being laid) they pointed out that in one room there was a pipe (hot & cold) with several joins which would be completely covered with screed.
They suggested it made more sense to do a pipe run with no joints underneath the Kingspan insulation, therefore eliminating the issue of these joints failing in the future as there are no joints.
The problem I had was that this needed doing that day, before they completed laying the underfloor heating as the screed was being poured the foillowing day. There was no time to contact the plumber and ask him to recitify it.
So my question is, were they right in what they said? Did the plumber make a mistake and am I correct in asking for the fee (£50) to be knocked off my final bill?
£50 is not a lot I appreciate that but it is just a bit disappointing that if what they're saying is correct this could have been avoided and if a joint did fail it could have cost me a lot of monoey to pull the kitchen tiles up, the floor boards and the screed to identify the problem.
Below is a pictur eof part of one of the pipes that was replaced. Each pipe (there were 2) had 3 of the joints that you can see which would have been covered in screed.
I am having a house built and the plumber has installed all of his pipes prior to the screed being laid on the ground floor. The screed will completely cover a number of pipes.
When the company arrived to fit the underfloor heating loops (prior to the screed being laid) they pointed out that in one room there was a pipe (hot & cold) with several joins which would be completely covered with screed.
They suggested it made more sense to do a pipe run with no joints underneath the Kingspan insulation, therefore eliminating the issue of these joints failing in the future as there are no joints.
The problem I had was that this needed doing that day, before they completed laying the underfloor heating as the screed was being poured the foillowing day. There was no time to contact the plumber and ask him to recitify it.
So my question is, were they right in what they said? Did the plumber make a mistake and am I correct in asking for the fee (£50) to be knocked off my final bill?
£50 is not a lot I appreciate that but it is just a bit disappointing that if what they're saying is correct this could have been avoided and if a joint did fail it could have cost me a lot of monoey to pull the kitchen tiles up, the floor boards and the screed to identify the problem.
Below is a pictur eof part of one of the pipes that was replaced. Each pipe (there were 2) had 3 of the joints that you can see which would have been covered in screed.