Search the forum,

Discuss Real world testing example of Condensing Boiler in older home in the Central Heating Forum area at PlumbersForums.net

Its very difficult to get a good reading in the heat pac due to restricted space but initially it actually seems to rise a little but I suspect this is because the boiler flow pipe turns down immediately where as the boiler return goes out the side of the boiler and then very gradually rises so I think the boiler contents are inclined to "circulate" back through the return. The cycling time matches ~ the rad heat demand but its not that simple as the boiler once it cuts back in when the stat reaches ~ 60/65C has to reheat say 20/25 litres of boiler water from ~ 40c to its cut out of 70C so requires ~ 0.9kwh which takes ~ 2.7 minutes from a 20kw boiler. In general, once other rads are brought back on line then the % firing time does reflect the heat demand.

Thanks for that! I just can't help thinking my boiler Is cycling alot and probably wasting alot of heat up the flue whilst doing so. It's following the stat too closely. Hence why I believe a Boiler Energy Manager will greatly help my system efficiency. They monitor the flow and return temps and calculate the load on the system, controlling the burner.

I can't find any information on that Vector Group item I purchased from fleabay. From what I read they cost about £1600 - £2k from the company but someone on ebay with good feedback etc was selling a new unused one for £30 Inc postage 🤔

I'll open it when it arrives and see if anything is labeled and what sensors I would need. But may not be able to use it myself if nothing is labeled inside and its only meant to be fitted by them so looking at other BEM systems for Domestic boilers at present.

Plan is:
Balance all rads precisely and see if I can get return temps down

Meter the burner etc at 26kw setup and run for a few days.

Then downsize nozzle and re-run the same test.

Then fit a BEM (and / or try the Vector super unit) and re test to see what reduction in consumption they may offer if any.
 
Tonight on upstairs zone only,

72 seconds on time
129 off time
Flow temp goes from 68.3 - 62.3.
Return temp seems to stay around 60c odd.

20220117_220630.jpg
 
Today I got the twin digital thermometers in the post. Which I wanted for accurate easy comparison of pipe temps.

20220119_193126.jpg

The first few I checked only had a few C drop.

I tried to guess the order of the rads and it wasn't working out. The first few would either die or have only a couple c difference. Couldn't get them to rise above that.

I did have luck adjusting one though which proves it is possible 😀

20220119_210127.jpg

So I should carry out the proper procedure. Open all rads, restart check order they heat. Cool again then start balancing in order from start. Will try to do that this Saturday all being well it will likely take ages!!

But I want to get it as balanced as possible. I'll aim for 9 or above I think the 11 or 12 may be out of reach but I'll try. The trick is to watch the flow temperature 🌡 so it doesn't start to drop whilst giving time for the difference to show. Aka easy to go too far and be on a false readout. It'll take me a while to get used to. I hope it's not working at present because I'm not following proper procedure!

The big kitchen rad in particular near boiler seems to want locksheild almost full open before it will heat up. Then drops dead if you turn below that. So some may not want to balance at all it is what it is.
 
Try with the pump speed on two instead of one
 
What are the dimensions of the kitchen rad and is it a double or single?.

The kitchen rad is a double myson 160cm wide x 50cm high panel. The pipe configuration isn't ideal on this one as it was a replacement bigger rad for an older one. Need to sink into floor still, may be able to make good in future:

20220119_221647.jpg

Try with the pump speed on two instead of one

Thanks I'll try that on Saturday. I'm thinking that since I'm not doing it correctly in order and all other locksheilds open that's not helping. So going by proper process maybe it will balance better.

Regarding the balancing just leave boiler stat at 70 or put up to 80 for the balancing procedure? And leave TRV heads on but full open / max temp?
 
Also it appears some of the TRVs are installed on the return side. This might make obtaining the desired 11c harder on those particular rads?

They are modern bi directional TRVs but still mixed up.

If thought to be a problem I could drain down and rectify that throughout house.
 
Tbh doesn’t really matter temp as that’s not a limiting factor

And tbh if your trying to balance it needs to be on the return as your throttling flow else
 
Tbh doesn’t really matter temp as that’s not a limiting factor

And tbh if your trying to balance it needs to be on the return as your throttling flow else

OK so yes boiler temp doesn't really matter.

Do you mean the locksheilds should be on the return pipe yes? If so I can rectify that throughout house where it occurs before I attempt a balance.
 
Would be best practice
 
Would be best practice

Yes that's OK I will make that good before I proceed - will try to get that done on Sat and system going again then balance on Sunday.

Since the upstairs and downstairs zones are programmed independently, I will balance them independently too.

This is a good video on the subject FWIW. Not how to balance but the theory of the efficiency and why it is important. A band aid to get a further rad to heat may be to turn pump speed up but as they explain it makes it worse even if that rad heats.

 
Any (if) build up of sludge in the rad itself has a huge effect on rad dT, I find that to make any appreciable difference in flowrate and dT that I would have to throttle in (either) one valve to only ~ 1/4 turn open, it seems, on my system anyway that I will only start increasing the dT by throttling from say 1/2 turn open, down.. Even with both valves fully open my rads have a dT of ~ 7C to 10C with a pump head of ~ 3.5M.
 
Last edited:
I checked the radiator valves and only a couple have the TRV on the return side. They are bi directional TRVs but all the same I will move them.

But thinking more about the 11c ideal temperature drop - how obtainable is this really? The Delta radiator temperature drop would be directly linked to the heat disapated into the room.

So the room temperature / weather would also be important.

It's very mild at present with temperatures outside at or near 7-10c. So in that case I think turning the boiler stat up for the balancing will provide better results unless the weather drops when I get to it.

Do you guys agree with what I'm saying in principle? If my rooms are 18c now, 7c outside and I am seeing 4 or 5 c drop max across a radiator then perhaps that is all it would achieve unless the room temperature dropped.

Maybe open the windows for balancing 😀
 
All my TRVs are on the returns and I can certainly balance/reduce rad outputs by throttling the lockshields, but as I said I reckon I would find it extremely difficult to get all rads to a dT of say 10C or 15c or whatever, having TRVs on all rads, once they throttle in will give a variable dT depending on the room temperature(s). I have watched my boiler return over the past few days and it never goes below 42/43C and probably averages more like 45/46C. I really think the best way to get a relatively constant low (but not below 38/ 40C for oil firing) is to use flow temperature control. You could get limited return temperature control by controlling the flow with a smart circ pump but this only allows a minimum rad output of ~ 58% whereas flow temperature control (if achievable) allows rad outputs as low as 30% with return temps not falling below ~36/38C.

1642716303417.png
 
All my TRVs are on the returns and I can certainly balance/reduce rad outputs by throttling the lockshields, but as I said I reckon I would find it extremely difficult to get all rads to a dT of say 10C or 15c or whatever, having TRVs on all rads, once they throttle in will give a variable dT depending on the room temperature(s). I have watched my boiler return over the past few days and it never goes below 42/43C and probably averages more like 45/46C. I really think the best way to get a relatively constant low (but not below 38/ 40C for oil firing) is to use flow temperature control. You could get limited return temperature control by controlling the flow with a smart circ pump but this only allows a minimum rad output of ~ 58% whereas flow temperature control (if achievable) allows rad outputs as low as 30% with return temps not falling below ~36/38C.

View attachment 73023

Controlling the return temperature would be good- but I am not a huge fan of smart pumps. On my house at least. Because some radiators drop out altogether. The pump now fitted does a great job.

But what I was thinking is wouldn't it be great to have a thermostatic device on the return pipe to the boiler which could sense the 50c return temp etc and maintain it. Eg throttle down automatically if the flow temp tries to climb above 50c but in all other instances normal flow. (Since I like 70c flow setting then 50c is what my system would be good at)

There must be something available along these lines. At a quick glance maybe something like this that can be set to thermostatically control a flow.


Get radiators balanced as precisely as possible first then something like this to provide precise control on return.
 

Attachments

  • Thermal-Balancing-Valve_TBV-002-0521_v4.pdf
    300.1 KB · Views: 3
Rad stats give individual room control so why throttle the main if the room stats are set properly and operating properly?. The boiler return temp will then be at its lowest possible but individual rad returns will vary from say 50/55C downwards, consistent with your requirement for a 70C constant flow temp, my rad stats give excellent individual room control.
 
Rad stats give individual room control so why throttle the main if the room stats are set properly and operating properly?. The boiler return temp will then be at its lowest possible but individual rad returns will vary from say 50/55C downwards, consistent with your requirement for a 70C constant flow temp, my rad stats give excellent individual room control.

Thanks yes not a great idea then was just throwing it out there as an alternative means to obtain the magical 20c drop if radiator balancing alone can achieve it.

Probably a case of do what you can with rad balancing and it is what it is. Eg 10c delta on boiler, if that's what you get then no more to reduce it by. But on colder days and warmup it will in realty be a greater delta.
 
Just read in a UPS 2 8M pump replacement post that a Dab Evoplus & a Grundfoss Magna 3 are suggested, you might be interested from the point of view that the also do temperature control, might be worth a look?.
 
Prob is the magna3 eg dt controlled with all the kit ends up around £600
 
Just read in a UPS 2 8M pump replacement post that a Dab Evoplus & a Grundfoss Magna 3 are suggested, you might be interested from the point of view that the also do temperature control, might be worth a look?.

Prob is the magna3 eg dt controlled with all the kit ends up around £600

I must read up on those but again I think my house suits a single speed pump.

Aka imagine some of the TRV valves start to close around the house. A smart pump would sense this and reduce the pressure or if it senses heat and modulates flow based on that then it would also throttle back the flow. And thus other radiators may fall dead again even when calling for heat.

It would work well no doubt in a new installation where the pipes and rads etc are properly designed installations but retrofitting into an old and somewhat unknown system / sizing probably won't give desired results IMO
 
Thinking more about it, would be inclined to agree with you, anyway when you balance your system you can just throttle the valve again until you get a average return temp of say 40Cish? and see how the system performs. if it is OK, then far cheaper maybe just to install a thermostatic valve in the line?. if it doesn't work you can just open it fully.
 
Thinking more about it, would be inclined to agree with you, anyway when you balance your system you can just throttle the valve again until you get a average return temp of say 40Cish? and see how the system performs. if it is OK, then far cheaper maybe just to install a thermostatic valve in the line?. if it doesn't work you can just open it fully.

Yes I'll balance it properly first and see where the temps are at then.

Then run when I can monitor run time and burn time for a few days. Then downsize nozzle and repeat for comparison.

Then add the boiler energy manager and see if that reduces cycling etc. If it does then I'll probably leave it set up like that.

The BEM company can't give good advice on the wiring FFS! Asked a few times and the emails back don't make sense. They appear confused if it should link before or after my boiler stat. So I'll probably have to test that too and see which setup works best.
 
If you can put up some instructions / wiring diagram will have a look later on
 
If you can put up some instructions / wiring diagram will have a look later on

Thanks for that, I attach the PDF manual and also an extract of the wiring diagram below:

Screenshot_20220121-180838_Adobe Acrobat.jpg


I have a CH wiring centre in my boiler room so no worries there. I understand their diagram also. But when I was simply asking that when installed on an oil boiler might it be best to link in before the boiler stat per diagram or go in between the stat and burner. Their reply was:

sorry for the delay responding, the black/grey cbles of the energy minder would smply wire in series with one of the cables from the boiler stat or their shoud be a link on the control panel for an external control wich would be removed and the black/grey cables wired into their place.

which doesn't help at all really they didn't understand what I was asking. I sent wiring diagram and photos of my boiler also. Anyway I'll follow their diagram and link thier black wires in between my "call live" wire from 240v zone valves switches and the boiler stat.
 

Attachments

  • energy-minder-auto-install.pdf
    359.7 KB · Views: 4
I was just thinking that if the logic in the board of the BEM would function better before or after the boiler stat.

If it goes before the stat then there will be instances where it will be calling for heat and the boiler stat is satisfied. Burner not firing.

If it goes between burner and boiler stat then only when the burner demand is being called by heating system and boiler stat will it get signal and be able to control without the boiler stat interfering.

Personally I think the later may be the better setup- what do you guys think? Not knowing the logic of the device fully means however I should prob follow their diagram all the same!
 
Not to confused things but I also did receive the Vector works BEM also. No instructions available for this one its top secret jobbie 🙄

On opening it, the connections are labeled. And it only has a power in, stat and boiler connections. No temperature monitoring aparantly. Not that I am qualified to comment but that hasn't stopped me before- appears limited for the high cost.

20220121_182627.jpg
 
Since the connections on the Vector unit were so simple I went ahead and wired it in temporarily at least. Boiler stat outlet going to "Stat" on its board. Burner wires connected to "boiler" on the board. Perm power added to remaining connection.

It appears to be working now. Upper figure is the call time of the boiler. Lower counter is the actual time it is firing the boiler.

So let's see if the house heats as well and the timers show a saving 🤔

20220121_201009.jpg
 
Havn't read all the posts yet so basically is it monitoring the cycle times and then by means of a relay interrupting the switched live to the boiler?. If so, what determines the optimum cycle time?.
 
I’m guessing dt as it’s got flow and return temp sensors
 
Very good, a bit of a challenge maybe though to determine the optimum cycling time as the dT through a oil fired boiler (non modulating) is never the same as the rad deltaT except the boiler is underrated., but lets see.
 
I’m guessing dt as it’s got flow and return temp sensors
Havn't read all the posts yet so basically is it monitoring the cycle times and then by means of a relay interrupting the switched live to the boiler?. If so, what determines the optimum cycle time?.

I think I have confused this sorry guys.

Yes Shaun the dt sensors you seen are on the domestic BEM I purchased.

However I had also purchased one of these


£30 brand new on ebay. Aparantly only fitted by them and at a cost of about £2k. So I wasn't sure what it would need or how it was wired since they provide no instructions.

So when I discovered the simple labeled connections after it arrived this evening I temporarily wired it in.

John's understanding is correct. But this vector unit does not measure pipe temperatures.

I think it waits for the boiler stat to first become satisfied on cold start. Then has some sort of programme to monitor the cycles thereafter and decide how to eliminate boiler cycling.

Haven't been watching it but had a glance earlier and it's gauges appear to be registering it is reducing burner time VS demand
 
I guess it sort of learns how long things take to get upto temp and then uses that data to calculate an approximate best run time after
 
I guess it sort of learns how long things take to get upto temp and then uses that data to calculate an approximate best run time after

I thought it would have sensors of some sort or connections for them but no. I find that slightly odd but they must have a programme that doesn't require that to do it's job. It makes sense though that it goes between boiler stat and burner. I think the other one should be wired the same way on any oil burner.

I will compare this one and the domestic one with dt sensors just to see do they save much run time and what they actually do to the on / off times and flow temps.

This is a good link on boiler cycling and why it's bad FWIW (you prob already know this but I found it interesting for the most part)

 

Reply to Real world testing example of Condensing Boiler in older home in the Central Heating Forum area at PlumbersForums.net

Creating content since 2001. Untold Media.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock