Search the forum,

Discuss Grundfos Alpha 2 AutoAdapt is slow in the Central Heating Forum area at PlumbersForums.net

Messages
27
Hi folks be glad of some help with this as its puzzling me.🤔

I have an Alpha 2 15-60-130 pump serving 12 Rads with thermo valves and Hot Water cylinder. The boiler is an Alpha CD18R

Since I had another rad installed downstairs I've noticed the heating pump has been noisier than usual ie running at full bore... annoying when it comes on during the early hours to start the days heating.

The engineer had left it set to III which runs at 45W. It gets the job done but at the cost of the noise. Problem is I dont know what the setting was before. When I put it onto autoadapt the rate drops down to 9W which seems way to slow to get all the rads piping hot. I've found the best compromise is to use the other Proportional Pressure setting on full which provides around 35W and is ok noise wise, but still feels excessive and not very energy efficient

Since it has an autoadapt feature i'd like that to be working for me but it just doesnt seem to give it enough pressure.

So two questions

Anything else I could be checking for?

What power wattage would you expect to see for my system?
 
Hi Marck, you can forget auto adapt as I've never seen anyone saying that it works, most, like you say that it runs at 9W which is completely useless. Strangely enough, the only pump that someone told me was running OK in "Auto" was a Tucson 6M pulling 23W which is quite acceptable.
A pump output of 20/25W is a reasonable power output to satisfy your 12 rads, I also have 12 rads and with my pump (Wilo Yonos Pico) set at a PP setting of 4.1M pulls between 14 and 21W depending on TRVs positions, I can set my pump on PP (or CP) settings incrementally in 0.1M steps, if I set it to your PP3? setting of 4.5M then it will pull around 31/33W, similar to yours. Unfortunately the Alpha2 pump has a big gap between the PP settings so if you were to set yours to PP2 which is 3.0M then you may find that is too low, you can try it (with all rads "full on", if its below ~ 14W then a bit weak IMO to satisfy all the rads, unfortunately, the CP settings are the same as the PP settings and the fixed speed settings are again either too low or too high.
But, its only a button press, would suggest trying PP2, CP2 and constant curve 2 (fixed speed 2) and jot down the pump power for each, you can then make a decision based on what I suggested above and if you don't mind, post back your results.

One other thing I notice is that your pump was pulling 45W at fixed speed 3 whereas according to the Alpha2 pump curves, the max pump output is limited to 35W.
 
Hey John.g thanks for your quick and detailed response its just what I needed.. 👏 I will have a look at the settings you suggest in the morning and post back 👍
[automerge]1585919551[/automerge]
Ok looked at it this morning at the heating was starting for the day.

I ran through the settings and this is what I got...
III - 45W
II - 19W
I - 6W
AuotpAdapt went up to 32W but quickly dropped to 12W
PP1 - 10 W
PP2 - 14 W
PP3 - 20 W
PP4 - 35 W

I might try it on PP3 for a while to see how it heats the rads, but PP4 seems to give the best Performance/Noise ratio for now.
 
Last edited:
There is no PP4 setting so you might just see which setting is giving you 35W, IF PP3 is actually the setting pulling 20W then that may satisfy your requirements, it might be easier to just run through the PP and the CP settings again, PP settings depict a radiator and the CP settings depict a (UFH) pipework.
[automerge]1585930541[/automerge]
Should have said PP mode depicts a sloping pump line and CP mode is a horizontal line.
 
Last edited:
Hmm🤔 Confusing. I don't see the icons you mention o my unit. I've attached a photo of it... the four settings on the right are the ones i'm assuming are PP settings
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200330_155904378.jpg
    IMG_20200330_155904378.jpg
    105.8 KB · Views: 21
I've "found" your pump I think, see attachment. You have three constant curve settings (left hand LEDs...I,II,III) and two PP & two CP settings, (right hand LEDs.....PP1,PP2,CP1,CP2). I have taken your readings and edited them below, I have also added the actual flows using the pump curves, you can see that CP2 gives, as you say, probably the best option but maybe worth giving CP1 a go as well. Once again Grundfos seem to provide, IMO, very poor settings but I think they are improving this with their new models.
For example, the three constant curves, which everyone in the world are familiar with are 1M,3M&6M, practically every other manufacturer would provide 2M,4M&6M, if you had the 4M setting available then you would run at ~ 25/27W which would have been be a perfect setting. Also the two PP settings of 1M & 3M are very poor as too low, should be ~3.5M&4.5M.
The CP settings of 3M & 4.5M are, again IMO, very good.
Auto Adapt......forget it.

III - 45W (6M)
II - 19W (3M)………….3.0M & 11.6 LPM
I - 6W (1M)
AuotpAdapt went up to 32W but quickly dropped to 12W
PP1 - 10 W (1M)
PP2 - 14 W (3M)……...2.0M & 10.3 LPM
CP1 - 20 W (3M)……..3.0M & 11.7 LPM
CP2 - 35 W (4.5M)......4.5M & 14.67 LPM
 

Attachments

  • Grundfos Alpha2 Old.pdf
    3.5 MB · Views: 19
Last edited:
Hi John.g You are a legend!!! You're help has made a massive difference. Thanks so much, its very much appreciated. That makes perfect sense now! Iv'e just looked in on the pump and it was actually pushing at 27W on the CP2 setting for mid-day. That kinda sounds like where I'd want to be. But having said that I have changed it to CP1 and (it went to 20W) to see how it goes for a while. I will leave it on that for a day or so and see if I get a noticeable change in temps etc...

You've been immensely helpful 👏👏👍

I will post back on my final conclusion in a day or so.
 
Ok so (using the CP2 setting @ 20W) this morning the house reached temp fine by the time I got up. When all the rads were cold I turned the heating up a few degrees and within 10 minutes they had all reached a good (hot to touch) temperature.

So I'm going to stick with the CP2 setting..

Thanks again for your help John.g
 
Ok so (using the CP2 setting @ 20W) this morning the house reached temp fine by the time I got up. When all the rads were cold I turned the heating up a few degrees and within 10 minutes they had all reached a good (hot to touch) temperature.

So I'm going to stick with the CP2 setting..

Thanks again for your help John.g

Apologies for the typo in my last... Its CP1 @ 20W that i'm finally sticking with NOT CP2 (thanks for the prompt John.g)
 
Thanks Marck, just one other test that I meant to ask you to carry out for the following reason.....
When I run my system in CP mode at 3M like yours, I also get 19/21W (Cyl+Rads). Cyl only:16W, Rads only: 20W which is OK but when I run Cyl+Rads I still only get 20/21W, the same as rads only which I find strange as both systems seem to get adequate heat.
When you get time, you might run your system as above, and note the readings, a minute or two on each will be plenty, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Marck, just one other test that I meant to ask you to carry out for the following reason...
When I run my system in CP mode at 3M like yours, I also get 19/21W (Cyl+Rads). Cyl only:16W, Rads only: 20W which is OK but when I run Cyl+Rads I still only get 20/21W, the same as rads only which I find strange as both systems seem to get adequate heat.
When you get time, you might run your system as above, and note the readings, a minute or two on each will be plenty, thanks.
I ran the tests With the same results
Cyl + Rads i get 21W
Cyl only 16W
Rads only 20W

Hotwater is heating fine and as I mentioned before all my rads are getting nice and hot in quick time. Hope this was useful to you
 
Uncanny, how both systems are identical, I can't figure out why there isn't any change in the readings/actual flow, I run mine normally on a PP setting of 4.2M and the power certainly changes when the rad TRVs close in and it varies from 18/20W to as low as 14W but gives exactly the same power readings (as in above tests) on the same tests which again proves that the total flow rate is unchanging.
 
Last edited:
Uncanny, how both systems are identical, I can't figure out why there isn't any change in the readings/actual flow, I run mine normally on a PP setting of 4.2M and the power certainly changes when the rad TRVs close in and it varies from 18/20W to as low as 14W but gives exactly the same power readings (as in above tests) on the same tests which again proves that the total flow rate is unchanging.



OK first of all i'm gonna pre-empt this by noting that i'm not technically knowledgeable about pumps and systems, so i can only try to apply some basic logic to this... If CP 1 is designed for systems without TRVS ie underfloor heating, isnt what's likely to be happening that... as the TRVS open and close the power remains relatively constant whilst the resulting pressure will vary? My pump will only show power figures (ie W) but I think I saw that some can show the pressure figures. So if you use a CP setting on a TRV system wont the pressure start varying but not the power?

Or is that way off point? or am I just showing how much of a numpty i am?
 
Nothing wrong with your thinking, the pump doesn't know or care what system it's on and all its doing is changing the speed up or down to keep the PRESSURE constant, so opening/shutting zone valves and/or TRV throttling should be reflected in the power requirement. If you were to throttle in the discharge valve on your pump you will see (or if not, I will be very surprised) the power falling to its minimum,13W when the valve is fully closed (no flow) See page 23 of the attached pump in one of the posts above. If you had the pump pumping out of a tank with a valve on its discharge to drain, then, depending on the valve opening, the pressure will be constant at 3M but the flowrate will change from 0 LPM/13W to a max of 35LPM/42W. That's my reading of it at any rate. I can only think that the total pipeline/rads/HWC coil losses remain the same so the flowrate remains the same but I find that hard to believe, someone might provide the answer.
[automerge]1586461377[/automerge]
The plot thickens or maybe becomes clearer.
When I installed my "smart" pump in 2018 I took a lot of readings and came across them just now while looking for something else.
With just ONE (any one) rad in service (3M CP) the pump pulls 14/16W ~ 5 LPM, almost exactly the same as the HWC coil on its own and with all rads in service (with all TRVs fully open) 20/21W as above which = a flow rate of ~ 11.5 LPM, so each rad (think of them as the rungs of a ladder) will flow ~ 0.94 LPM, my rad sizes average 1.25 kw so this gives a deltaT of 14.4C which is what one might expect. So it would seem that the flow& return circuit absorbs more than 1/2 the pump head and the rad/rads, the other 1/2, this is actually the basis on which pump manufacturers determine the PP pump curves.
 
Last edited:
Okay well... Now I have a new dilemma. Things have been working fine until the system developed a water leak on a faulty air release valve near the boiler. British Gas came out a couple of weeks back and fitted a replacement valve, but I've recently noticed now that the pump does not run at the same power rating anymore..🥴

Whereas setting III produced 45W it now produces only 33W
Setting II ran at 19W but now it only runs at 13W

The rads all still heat up hot to touch, but the system seems noisy by comparison to before. The 13W on setting II is ok, but anything more is too noisy to leave it at... ie I can get it to run at 22W if I set it to CP2 but the low hum is too noticeable.

Is 13W an ok power level?

What could be causing it to suddenly run at lower power levels?

Air in the system?

or summat else?

I'll probs ring BG on monday to see what they think, but it would be good to have some idea of what might be come up.
 
Only have my ancient Iphone3? to look at pump curves but all those (new) numbers tells me that the pump is practically circulating nothing on any of the settings so it looks like you have a air problem as its very unlikely that its a pump problem, I would suggest checking boiler pressure, boiler flow & return valves fully open, also open that newly installed vent if externally accessible or anywhere else that you can vent the system manually, vent the pump as this may be the problem.
 
Only have my ancient Iphone3? to look at pump curves but all those (new) numbers tells me that the pump is practically circulating nothing on any of the settings so it looks like you have a air problem as its very unlikely that its a pump problem, I would suggest checking boiler pressure, boiler flow & return valves fully open, also open that newly installed vent if externally accessible or anywhere else that you can vent the system manually, vent the pump as this may be the problem.

Thanks again for your help John.g, I've since found the pump is only about 3 yrs old from its date stamp... I'm gonna ring British Gas again and ask them to take another look. I've tried all the rads and no air in any of them. The Alpha 2 doesn't seem to have a manual bleeding option so i'm a bit stumped on that. the only vent I can see is the new one and that one has nothing coming out either. I'll post back when I get a solution.. 😶
 
Its strange because on the three selected modes/speeds the pump seems to be producing the exact head for each, 3M, 4.5M and 6M, but at zero flow, it would point to something being shut off but don't know how you are getting any circulation at all, also the boiler should be cycling rapidly if no/low circulation, if you just briefly close the pump discharge valve and if the power (W) doesn't change then that means no pumping. I think that pump is pumping downwards? which doesn't help any air removal, not helped of course by not having a proper pump manual venting screw, if you have a unvented system you might consider pressurising the system to say 2.5 bar which might collapse some of the air bubbles (if present) and then reducing the pressure (if you can establish pumping) to its normal 1.5 bar or whatever by means of a rad vent.

You could also consider opening the ABV valve located just below the pump fully which might establish pumping, but carefully note its indexed setting before doing so and return it to this setting later.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting....

Its an open vented system.. so i guess i can't pressurise it.

What i have noticed is that when the boiler cuts off the rate drops from 33w to 30w (Setting III) so its reacting to that.. does that indicate a level of flow
 
Possibly, I suppose, but would only be a few LPM at most, I wouldn't run the pump on speed iii with a open vented system, suggest CP1 or CP2, presume header tank is full of water, have you tried opening the ABV? Also assume you have run both CH & HW together, is the boiler running continuously once there is a demand?.
 
Last edited:
Ok so we had a frost last night so pretty cold this morning when i turned to system back on to monitor... took about 30 minutes before all the rads started to get warm and 50 mins before they were all hot to touch. I'm guessing it should be quicker than that..

Header has water, cant seem to shift the ABV (and don't want to force it) and yes have had both CH & HW running at the same time and the pump continues to run at 13W on Setting II (I'm using Setting II for continuity as that's what its been on and runs quietest on)

Yes the boiler seems to run continuously (barring one hickup when it first started up from cold).

No pressure gauges to check pressure

I've been studying the pipework to understand the how the flow works... The flow out of the boiler is as you'd expect very hot... the return to the boiler is just warm (I can keep my hand on it)

All of this seems (logically) to suggest the flow is low... Its so perplexing.

I have British Gas coming out tomorrow as a follow up on the previous job, I'll leave the system cold for them so they'll get to see how it starts and performs from cold.

Will feed back after the visit.

Thanks again for you help... much appreciated as always 👍
 
Last edited:
50 minutes wouldn't be indicative of a very poor circulation rate IMO, but certainly is reduced based on the boiler return temperature, but how this is achieved with that indicated 13W on speed ii is a mystery to me, last April/May you were getting 19W which made perfect sense as it's ~ 10.2 LPM at a 3M head., 13W indicates zero flow.

You might consider just doing one more test (takes only 10/15secs) just shut the pump discharge valve and see what the indicated pump power is, then fully re open it, as you are at it just confirm that the pump suction valve is also fully open.

Just thinking about the circ flow again, assuming your boiler modulates to say 5kw then you may be circulating as low as 2 to 3 LPM which probably wouldn't be measured by the pump power......so either air or a blockage (severe).
 

Attachments

  • Alpha2 Pump Curves.zip
    59.7 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
OK, thanks, sincerely hope not but if BG drained down the system to install that air vent and if dirty then there is a chance that the boiler Hx is blocked.
 
:oops: That doesn't sound good...

They didn't need to drain it down as the boiler is upstairs and the valve is at the highest point.

From a logic point of view its been running fine up and till the leak... so seems to have been an issue since the air bleed valve was leaking... now that i've worked out how the flow runs I see the valve sits on the return right above the inlet to the boiler...

could air be trapped in the boiler?

Do boilers have internal bleed valves that BG might try?
 
There should definitely be one inside the boiler casing on the boiler flow, I think these are normally closed after initial fill or refilling so BG can certainly check this out.
Even though the boiler is upstairs the header tank must be still higher so they must have shut a isolating valve (if fitted) on the cold feed to remove the air vent?
 
Solved! BG came and the engineer removed the pump... turns out the impeller was sludged up with a coating of crud. She cleaned it off reinstalled and it now runs sweet and like a dream... Full speed on all settings without any of the noise that I had before.

The whole system seems to be running so much better...

Go figure...

Thanks for you help John.g
I learn something each time in on here and am always grateful for the comments.. 🥇👏
 
Solved! BG came and the engineer removed the pump... turns out the impeller was sludged up with a coating of crud. She cleaned it off reinstalled and it now runs sweet and like a dream... Full speed on all settings without any of the noise that I had before.

The whole system seems to be running so much better...

Go figure...

Thanks for you help John.g
I learn something each time in on here and am always grateful for the comments.. 🥇👏

Greatt news alright Marck, wouldn't have thought that was the problem, we can all learn from that. What setting and power output are you on now?
 
So it was left running on III at 45W but I'm probably gonna try running it on CP2 (35W) Looking at your previous power/flow rates CP2 seems a good balance..

It runs quiet as a mouse on all settings now..
 
Can you try it on CP1 which was your last permanent setting and see if the power is 20W as originally, it will also tell us exactly the head and flowrate now.
 

Reply to Grundfos Alpha 2 AutoAdapt is slow in the Central Heating Forum area at PlumbersForums.net

Creating content since 2001. Untold Media.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock