Search the forum,

Discuss ACV Cylinders - back to front?? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Status
Not open for further replies.

Worcester

Esteemed
Plumber
Messages
1,005
Just visited a site today where they are having big problems with insufficient volume and insufficient flow of hot water.

Happens to be heated by ASHP (a cascaded bank of 5 x 9kW) so posted it here :) (maybe I should have put it in the commercial forum :) )

Attached a schematic, looking from the front of the cylinders, the cold / mains in is top right and then they are plumbed in SERIES, so out of top left into top right of the next one, and again, and then out of top left to showers / (demand) etc

Are these plumbed in back to front?

Anyone else seen them plumbed in SERIES before ?.....

The fourth one appears to have been configured as a buffer tank for the Heating circuits..

Thoughts / comments please - and yes I have sent loads of details up to ACV technical.

It's not one of ours, however the original installer isn't interested in fixing the problems.
HydraulicLayout_Small.jpg
 
Err yes looks wrong. Floors should be off bottom and pumps off the top with a shunt into the headder (base of tank) . Reverse flow? Why the hell not put it on to headders like any sane person? Fine with dense heat but from a gshp? Is it tidy or dogs dinner?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No blending valve? On DHW? What size heat pumps? 3 x 70kw @ 80c? Dream on!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No blending valve? On DHW? What size heat pumps? 3 x 70kw @ 80c? Dream on!!!

Do they need all that water? Not be better with a few buffers and one dhw? I'm sure u can put in series, problem is that the heating load stealing all the heat from top and your not getting stratification and thus a hot water getting cooler across the bank not hotter??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's using the existing rads - no changes to the heating circuit - hence the high temp heat pumps running at > 50° - the CO2 ones can do that, and some get a reasonable CoP
 
It's a pair of custom made manifolds to go from 5 heat pumps to 4 cylinders... and no, they don't have a reverse flow balanced set up for them, so cylinder 4 has further to travel than cylinder 1

All flow from the HP's to the cylinders relies on the HP circlulation pumps (on the return side, HP side of the manifold)
 
Shouldn't cylinder 1 be the longest and thus coldest. And 3 the shortest and thus hottest as at this point DHW leaves system? The recovery will be horrific on a system set up like that? I would have 2 300l on DHW and two as a buffer if not 5! The cylinders can recover very quickly due to s/a but 50kw for all 3 , take 9 years to recover each cylinder will gobble 65kw easy for fast recovery so why not superheat buffers ? Because as soon as top end of cascade cools it's game over and red hot ashp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As ermi has said those cylinder aren't going to stratify with the way they've been connected, multiple returns and the heating return dumped in the bottom as well I would imagine. Therefore, surely you'll need to have 1200 litres of water at a suitable temperature (50 +) to achieve a steady supply of DHW? That's a big ask from 5 9kw units.
 
Last edited:
Yep, was installed by an allegedly leading award winning company. Mind you, they are a very big fan of Mitsubishi Ecodans guess that says quite a bit!

I wouldn't be surprised to see some litigation over fit for purpose around this one.

I reckon that it could salvaged with a complete redesign of the hydraulics, though with natural gas available on site, whether it's worthwhile trying to salvage any of the heat pump usage with a bivalent control system, vs two gas boilers will be an interesting exercise.

Why they have plumbed it like they have has me completely confused, and I'm also pretty sure that the DHW flow is back to front through the cylinders as well. I can't see how this works hydraulically at all. Seems like a complete dogs dinner.

Incompetence, a mistake or bad design? Not sure, does it matter?

Still waiting for a definitive analysis from ACV, all they did was send me the installation pdf, not what I was expecting..

Anyone get any other ideas as to the best way to connect them ? -
BufferTankConnections.jpg
 
Last edited:
Spent rest of day trying to figure it out too. ACV may have designed the system , buts it's Defo wrong installed wrong. . Possibly thought process was for 900l of 45c and a buffer for the heating? Bi valiant as discussed defo way forward. The load probably was what cooked the HP.

Think the AC lads seen it in a pool or something and thought we can do that easy. So copied but not paid attention to the requirement for 210kw of 90c heat
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's there electric bill ?

Horrendous! That along with the problems of insufficient Hot Water have been the trigger to finally do something about it.

It has been wrong from day 1 - client wasn't aware as they didn't know what to expect from the system.

As I understand it the control system can trigger the immersion heaters, and I reckon that have been boosting the whole of the heating system, when it's not achieving temperature. The controls are VERY basic, and lacks sensors where I would have expected to find them.

The challenge is who's going to pay..
 
Horrendous! That along with the problems of insufficient Hot Water have been the trigger to finally do something about it.

It has been wrong from day 1 - client wasn't aware as they didn't know what to expect from the system.

As I understand it the control system can trigger the immersion heaters, and I reckon that have been boosting the whole of the heating system, when it's not achieving temperature. The controls are VERY basic, and lacks sensors where I would have expected to find them.

The challenge is who's going to pay..

We shall all chip in and help towards the £16k to put it right. Us tradesmen don't like to see the industry dragged down by halfwhit
 
"The challenge is who's going to pay.."

You ?

From the pics the installation was done @ 5 - 6 years ago ( dates on equipment from photos )

If you go to court defending the customer, you are going to end up with carp like:
- system maintenance, life of system, why has it taken so long for the system to be proven inadequate, has the use of hot water changed over that period..and so on.


If it was me looking at this job in respect to fixing it up, I would be getting an engineers report done on the system.
That way you can keep an arms length away from that side of proceedings.

As for repairs / rectifications, it could depend on what you feel and the customer feels is the best way to go.
Once again, it may be better to have an engineer have some involvement in this.

I'm not saying that you can't design a new or repair the existing system.
It may be beneficial to you to have a company design a new system, so that your backside won't be on the line in the future with this already upset and skeptical customer.
 
"The challenge is who's going to pay.."

You ?

It's not OUR install!!!

We were ORIGINALLY called in because one of the heat pumps wasn't working and the original installer says it's out of warranty > 3 years and wanted £750 just to turn up to look at what was wrong with the heat pump.

Then the can of worms opened, as when I started looking at it I started asking about the running costs and why it was configured they way it was.

Hence my earlier post about possible litigation against the original installer "not fit for purpose"
Reading through the original installers website they are much bigger on air-con (A2A) than they are on A2W heating.



Or - were you meaning that if we fix it and it still doesn't work, it will just come back to bite me! :(
 
Last edited:
Worcester
Rip them silly heat pumps out and either if natural gas a few boilers in Sequence or a wood pellet boiler with buffer
1 of them acv cylinders could cope with the hot water demand if done properly
 
Without looking at it in depth, could you not re configure?

2x buffers into which heat pumps heat and heating circuit flow and returns are connected, 2x DHW cylinders in parallel.

DHW prioritised, heating zoned off when DHW temp drops, 600 litres of DHW on tap with 600 litre buffers in reserve, heating should be able to pick up fairly instantly once DHW satisfied.

Could sequence buffers if you felt the need.

Are they claiming RHI ? Seems a shame to rip it all out.

Gonna spill the beans on who did it?
 
But those buffers need to be hot hot hot to recover. Dhw should be at 85c in ACV not 45, hence the current MASSIVE volume of Luke warm water - heat pumps only dishing out the love at 50c ! Cylinders feel bit like old boiler in massage parlour....... Never quite hitting the boil!!
 
Flow is king for the heat pumps, quick turn over needed hence 2 buffers on standby. Once you start losing the pumps won't be adequate to keep up with demand.

those ACV's are tank in tank aren't they? They have a big surface area to match the big flow rates required.
 
Huge s/a deliver fantastic flow rates but need very dense heat very quickly to work well. 70kw at 80c ish!!!
 
Yep, they're tank in tank, the surface area isn't massive though, it's only about 2.8sqm, which for a heat pump isn't large, so recovery wouldn't be that rapid.

You're thinking is similar to mine, reconfigure it as two Cylinders for the Hot Water and use 2 as buffers for the heating, with priority on the Hot Water and gas boiler to kick in if rapid recharge needed. - that way 600 litres should be enough - that's only 12 showers @ 5 mins @ 9 litres/ min, though if teeing off at 20 min intervals it gives nearly 60 mins for recovery b*gg*r*d if they do a shotgun though when all 72 players finish at the same time! No heat pump would ever keep up with that, hence the gas boiler.

Even so 600 litres buffer and 600 litres hot water is still on the small side - we put a minimum of 50 litres per KW buffers in for heating on Heat Pumps - so that would mean at least 2000 litres just for that, and for the hot water, if no rapid heat source backup, then 900-1200 litres.

Just done a quick calc: 9 showers running at 9 litres per min, raising temp for 10° (ambient) to 35° requires an input of 145kW! Which is why even a house combi running one shower need to be at least 16kW, with losses = 20kW

At the moment no RHI as it was installed and commissioned before A2W was permitted for Commercial RHI, though if re-configured with new HP's if the manufacturer will step in and save face, it could be.

Who did it? Couldn't possibly say, however if you check out the information I've provided a quick Google search with the key information in will enable you to find out :)
 
It's not OUR install!!!

We were ORIGINALLY called in because one of the heat pumps wasn't working and the original installer says it's out of warranty > 3 years and wanted £750 just to turn up to look at what was wrong with the heat pump.

Then the can of worms opened, as when I started looking at it I started asking about the running costs and why it was configured they way it was.

Hence my earlier post about possible litigation against the original installer "not fit for purpose"
Reading through the original installers website they are much bigger on air-con (A2A) than they are on A2W heating.



Or - were you meaning that if we fix it and it still doesn't work, it will just come back to bite me! :(

Sorry mate,

I don't think I am the only one who has the problem of putting in writing what would come across differently verbally.

What you wrote was ' The challenge is who is going to pay'

I was trying to say, in reply, - The challenge is who is going to pay you.

Obviously its not going to be a cheap repair.

Appologies
 
Sorry mate,

I don't think I am the only one who has the problem of putting in writing what would come across differently verbally.

What you wrote was ' The challenge is who is going to pay'

I was trying to say, in reply, - The challenge is who is going to pay you.

Obviously its not going to be a cheap repair.

Appologies

Gordon's really cheap..... He only quoted £17.99 to supply and install all required components
 
Yep !
 
Capacity (primary)
spacer.gif
293 L
Heating surface DHW tank
spacer.gif
51 mbar
Primary flow
spacer.gif
1" (F) Ø
Connection - DHW
spacer.gif
 
[DLMURL="http://www.acv.com/gb-en/03_06/442/app.rvb"]SLE Plus 300 - ACV[/DLMURL]

Actually only 200 litres of DHW per tank, 93 litres of 'buffer' and only 2.29m2 surface area per tank...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How about converting all to DHW and installing a dedicated buffer?
 
Capacity 200litres at 60c per cylinder will give a hell of a lot of hot water at say 38c
And with re heat time this can be almost continuos
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Reply to ACV Cylinders - back to front?? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Creating content since 2001. Untold Media.

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock